Tag Archives: Response

Pakistan to Acquire Global Response Cutters in $350M Sale

The State Department has made a determination approving a possible Foreign Military Sale to Pakistan for GRC43M Cutters and associated equipment, parts, training and logistical support for an estimated cost of $350 million. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency delivered the required certification notifying Congress of this possible sale today.

The Government of Pakistan has requested the purchase of 8 43-meter Global Response Cutters (GRC43M). Each Cutter will be a mono-hull design made of Glass Reinforced Plastic (GRP). Also included in this sale: outfitted 8 25mm or 30mm Naval Gun Systems, 32 M2-HB .50 caliber machine guns, 32 7.62mm guns, 8 8- meter Rigid Inflatable Boats, ballistic/armor protection of critical spaces, command and control equipment, communication equipment, navigation equipment, support equipment, spare and repair parts, tools and test equipment, technical data and publications, personnel training, U.S. government and contractor engineering, technical, and logistics support services, and other related elements of logistics and program support. The total estimated cost is $350 million.

This proposed sale will contribute to the foreign policy and national security of the United States by helping to improve the security of a country vital to U.S. foreign policy and national security goals in South Asia.

This sale will enhance Pakistan’s ability to enforce the rule of law over its coastal areas to safeguard seaborne energy corridors, deter the outbreak of piracy along the north Arabian Sea, and curtail the trafficking of narcotics and other illicit goods. These vessels provide the Pakistan Navy with the capability for medium to long endurance coverage of its 660 miles of coastline. Pakistan will have no difficulty absorbing GRC43M Cutters into its armed forces.

This sale will not alter the basic military balance in the region.

The principal contractor will be WSY, Inc. in Port Angeles, Washington. There are no known offset agreements proposed in conjunction with this potential sale.

Implementation of this proposed sale will require multiple trips by U.S. Government and contractor representatives to participate in program and technical reviews plus training and maintenance support in country, on a short-term temporary basis, for a period of no more than 60 months or until the last Cutter is delivered to Pakistan and integrated into their operating forces.

There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a result of this proposed sale.

This notice of a potential sale is required by law and does not mean the sale has been concluded.

Related Topic Tags

Related Defense, Military & Aerospace Forum Discussions

View the Original article

Comments Off on Pakistan to Acquire Global Response Cutters in $350M Sale

Filed under Defence Talk

Army increases in-flight situational awareness for rapid response forces

With help from the Army’s new in-flight internet and mission command capability, commanders of Global Response Force units will be able to plan missions in the air, while their Soldiers receive operational updates and watch full-motion video of upcoming drop zones before their parachutes ever open.

“The ability to understand a situation gives you the ability to take appropriate action, and if the GRF (Global Response Force) can understand a situation before they get to their drop location, then they can be more effective from the moment boots hit the ground,” said Lt. Col. Joel Babbitt, product manager for Warfighter Information Network-Tactical, or WIN-T, Increment 1, which manages the new in-flight capability for the Army. “Instead of landing on the ground, analyzing the situation and developing execution plans, they can hit the ground executing.”

The joint GRF essentially consists of two components — the Air Force that supplies and sustains the C17 and C130 aircraft, and the Army’s XVIII Airborne Corps, primarily the 82nd Airborne Division. The GRF needs to be able to rapidly deploy at a moment’s notice and effectively command and control forces from the air.

To help meet these requirements, the Army’s new Enroute Mission Command Capability, or EMC2, is being installed on C17 aircraft. The U.S. Special Operations Command, known as USSOCOM, which oversees the special operations component commands of each service, already has aircraft outfitted with their own version of this in-flight capability. The Army’s EMC2 system integrated on additional C17s would expand that initial USSOCOM capability, supporting the increased expeditionary nature of today’s forces.

The Army is scheduled be begin testing of EMC2 installed on the C17s at multiple locations this summer, and the capability is expected to pass the U.S. Air Forces’ stringent Safe to Fly Requirements by the end of August 2014. On the current timeline, equipment is expected to be issued to the XVIII Airborne Corps by the end of the calendar year.

EMC2 provides internet service, mission command applications, full-motion video, intelligence products and collaborative planning tools along with a complete office suite of computers and voice phones — all onboard an airplane. It enables en-route mission command, so that as the situation develops in the destination target area, commanders will be able to get updates, understand changes on the ground and be able to adjust their plan to accommodate for those changes, Babbitt said.

“It will be a transformation in the situational awareness and effectiveness of the GRF in the first several hours of ground operations,” he said.

One of the main components of EMC2 is the Fixed Install Satellite Antenna, or FISA, which provides the internet connection for the C17. Similar to the capability being used and implemented by today’s commercial airlines, FISA posed a low technical risk for Army adoption. From a frequency perspective, the Army is looking to utilize both Ku (commercial) and Ka (military) band in one antenna on the C17s for optimum bandwidth and efficiency.

“The FISA provides a fourfold increase in bandwidth so that a new host of services can be employed on board, increasing capability for GRF units to plan and maintain critical situational awareness in the air,” said Capt. Mindy Brown, EMC2 lead for PdM WIN-T Increment 1.

The U.S. military already has satellites, airplanes and drones that provide standard and high definition full-motion video. With EMC2, those feeds can now be displayed on board the aircraft on LED screens, along with integrated marquees and an intercom system.

“Being able to see the airfield where you are going to be landing, to see that drop zone, helps Soldiers get their heads fully into the operation so they are better prepared for the mission at hand,” Brown said.

The key capability of EMC2 does not just reside in the antenna, but also in the incorporation of the Key leader Enroute Node. It will provide airborne units with broadband reach-back data capability; secure Voice Over Internet Protocol communications between task force commanders and combatant commanders; as well as communication between aircraft.

“For the GRF, EMC2 is an absolutely disruptive technology to the traditional way of doing business, and will transform operations,” Babbitt said.

As part of the GRF mission, with the Air Force providing the aircraft, the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division has deployment-ready paratroopers and infantrymen who can provide an immediate military capability on the ground in a very short period of time to any location worldwide. In 1991, in its role as GRF, the 82nd Airborne was the first force on the front line between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, shortly after Kuwait was invaded by Saddam Hussein’s troops. The GRF was also activated for a humanitarian mission during the earthquake in Haiti, in 2010.

Well-equipped, rapidly deployable units such as the GRF are a vital part of the Army’s evolving force structure as it strives to become a leaner, more capable and expeditionary force. Advanced network capabilities such as EMC2 will continue to increase force mobility and agility by making it easier for Soldiers to get the information they need to be successful, anytime, anywhere.

“EMC2 will not only enable the Airborne Task Force commander to better understand developing situations, but it will also increase the situational awareness for all of the joint servicemen and women in the aircraft,” Babbitt said. “It really comes down to mental preparation and the ability to plan ‘on the fly.’”

Related Topic Tags

Related Defense, Military & Aerospace Forum Discussions

View the Original article

Comments Off on Army increases in-flight situational awareness for rapid response forces

Filed under Defence Talk

East Africa Response force deploys for 1st time

Four days after their official transfer of authority ceremony, U.S. Army Soldiers with Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa’s East Africa Response Force deployed for the first time since being established earlier this year.

The Soldiers loaded onto a U.S. Air Force C-130 Hercules Dec. 14, and deployed to South Sudan, supporting the U.S. Embassy’s ordered departure.

“When the 1/18th arrived in Djibouti, we stressed that they needed to be ready to hit the ground running,” said Maj. Gen. Terry Ferrell, Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa, or CJTF-HOA, commanding general. “And, they’ve proven they were. This is why we’re here, and all of the joint CJTF-HOA team is coming together to support them. I’m proud of the work they are doing.”

The Soldiers hail from the 1st Combined Arms Battalion, 18th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, based at Fort Riley, Kan., known as the “Vanguard Nation.”

They are the second unit assigned to the East Africa Response Force, or EARF, part of a new initiative of regionally aligned forces, which provides the commander of U.S. Africa Command an additional capability to respond to crises and contingencies within East Africa.

“I am extremely proud of the professionalism and selfless service of the ‘Vanguard Nation’ as we protect facilities throughout the Horn of Africa. We are on point for the Nation, and responsible for protecting the U.S. Embassy in Juba this holiday season,” said Lt. Col. Robert Magee, commander of the 1/18th CAB, who is deployed with the response force. “By doing so, we’re supporting the ambassador’s diplomatic mission to resolve conflict here in South Sudan.”

Magee said embassy security personnel noted that the EARF’s arrival seemed to help calm the entire city.

“Prior to our landing, widespread small arms fire occurred throughout the city for three days running,” said Magee, but he added that the South Sudan army and their national police “deserve the credit for restoring security in Juba.”

The U.S. Army developed the regionally aligned forces initiative to provide combatant commanders with rapidly deployable forces, which can relocate anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice. The 1/18th CAB is regionally aligned with Africa, specifically the Horn of Africa region, key to the CJTF-HOA mission to strengthen East African partner nation militaries by conducting crisis response and personnel recovery supporting U.S. military, diplomatic and civilian personnel throughout East Africa.

Related Topic Tags

Related Defense, Military & Aerospace Forum Discussions

View the Original article

Comments Off on East Africa Response force deploys for 1st time

Filed under Defence Talk

‘Vibrant Response’ trains troops for nuclear disaster

It is not a scene one would wish to envision: an explosion in an American town, with the emergency response broadcast blaring a message of caution over loud speakers to concerned citizens affected by the blast. Burning buildings, clothes scattered in every direction, debris blocking once passable roadways, all are merely a small portion of a nightmare scenario.

During the field training exercise Vibrant Response 13-2, or VR 13-2, which runs Aug. 10-17, at the Muscatatuck Urban Training Center, or MUTC, civil Support teams train for the unexpected.

“The venues at MUTC, along with ability to use multiple smoke and flame effects, enhance the training and make it as real as it gets,” said Paul Condon, joint exercise planner, U.S. Army North (Fifth Army).

About 5,700 service members and civilians from the local, state and federal agencies flooded in to the MUTC and Camp Atterbury training areas to train on responding to a catastrophic domestic incident. VR 13-2, a major field training exercise conducted by U.S. Northern Command and led by U.S. Army North, is designed to help all components respond to disasters in a timely manner as they provide assistance to the American people.

The MUTC is a 1,000-acre urban training site near Camp Atterbury, Ind., that specializes
in real-world training scenarios. The training center is designed to add realism by simulating an actual American city in turmoil.

“The environment replicates an actual American town,” said Jay Norris, an observer controller/trainer division chief with Army North, who hails from Edinburg, Miss. “It has all the facilities of a typical small town, and that is the type of environment we’ll be operating in after a disaster strikes. The scenario is set in an American city where there has been a nuclear detonation, and these units are responding to that disaster.”

“This (the MUTC) looks like the very first episode of the TV series ‘The Walking Dead’ with all of the signs hanging, fires blazing and the appearance of absolute desertion,” said Sgt. Nicholas Erridge, a chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear, or CBRN, specialist from Portage, Ohio. He serves with the 51st Civil Support Team, or CST, Michigan National Guard, Joint Force Headquarters, out of Battle Creek, Mich. “This is a unique, realistic training environment.”

Taking advantage of the unique training environment are the CST units, which have specific missions they train for in order to prepare them for a real-world, American catastrophe.

“The mission for our unit, during the training, is to assist the first responders by providing route reconnaissance as well as setting up decontamination sites; we would handle the CBRN incidents,” explained Erridge.

The CST’s primary mission is to support the incident commander as well as those first responders (local, state and federal) by establishing safe areas through route reconnaissance and determining where there are potential radiological and chemical hazards, explained Maj. Ronald Crane, commander of the 53rd Civil Support Team, Indiana National Guard, Joint Force Headquarters Indiana, from Indianapolis.

“The civilian leadership is a critical part of our mission,” said Crane. “In fact, they are whom we are designed to work for. We work for the incident commander, so our ability to train with them is absolutely important to understanding of our roles.”

Role players helped provide a more realistic scenario by calling for assistance.

“While on recon mission, we ensure the citizens get the correct information on sheltering in place and know that help is on the way,” Crane said.

The civilian role players help provide a realistic feel to the training conducted at the center.

“Most of the time with military training exercises, we encounter dummies or we would have training aids to simulate the displaced citizens,” said Erridge, “but there is an added value when people play the role, realistic training.”

The psychological effects of seeing an actual person, as opposed to training aids, adds a level of difficultly appreciated on all levels of training.

“I believe, this is the closest that we can get to a ‘real-life’ mission, having civilian role players gives us a better opportunity to ‘train as we would fight,’” said Erridge.

The training at MUTC provides an opportunity to enhance unity and cohesion for personnel, who have never worked together before.

“My unit is supported by the 51st CST, a National Guard unit from Michigan,” said Staff Sgt. Dan’l Stebbins, a human resource specialist, who operates as a chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear specialist. Stebbins, who hails from Indianapolis, serves with the 53rd Civil Support Team, Indiana National Guard, Joint Force Headquarters Indiana.

“Having the Michigan CST here helps build our team and enforce stronger bonds between both units,” said Stebbins. “Right now, we have a very unique situation for the civil support teams; we have a combined footprint, meaning the Indiana CST is working in conjunction with the Michigan CST to establish a base of operation.”

Even working in a joint environment adds to the training conducted at the MUTC.

“It is a little easier when working with strictly Army personnel because they understand the terminology, but working together as a joint workforce brings an added value to the training,” Erridge said.

The MUTC focuses on providing realistic scenarios to train personnel for “real-world” situations.

“Muscatatuck provides an opportunity not just for the trainees, but also the trainers,” Crane said. “It leads the way for other training sites to come up with good training through complexity and realistic environments.”

Those participating in the exercise said the training opportunity is one they won’t soon forget.

“This is my first Vibrant Response training,” concluded Erridge. “It has been an awesome and memorable training experience.”

Related Topic Tags

Related Defense, Military & Aerospace Forum Discussions

View the Original article

Comments Off on ‘Vibrant Response’ trains troops for nuclear disaster

Filed under Defence Talk

Crisis Response Marines Familiarize Italian Naval Aviation with Osprey

By on Tuesday, July 9th, 2013

TARANTO-GROTTAGLIE AIR BASE, Italy: Members of Special Purpose-Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response, or SP-MAGTF Crisis Response, visited Taranto-Grottaglie Air Base, Italy, June 28, to familiarize Italian naval aviation leaders with the MV-22 Osprey and to also celebrate the 100th anniversary of Italian naval aviation.

SP-MAGTF Crisis Response is a rotational force of approximately 500 Marines and sailors, tasked to respond to crises in the U.S. Africa Command area of responsibility, sourced from a variety of Marine Corps units to include II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, N.C.

The Marines brought two Ospreys to the air base and conducted a capabilities brief and a static display of the aircraft, followed by a familiarization flight, in which Italian Admiral Giuseppe De Giorgi, chief of the Italian Navy; Italian Rear Admiral Paolo Treu, chief of Italian Naval Aviation; and Italian Vice Admiral Filippo Foffi, chief of the Italian Fleet, flew aboard the aircraft with Lt. Col. Christian Harshberger, Aviation Combat Element commanding officer for SP-MAGTF Crisis Response.

“Italy doesn’t currently have an aircraft that is both capable of vertical take-off and also can carry troops and cargo, so this was an excellent opportunity to demonstrate the capabilities of the MV-22,” said Capt. Nicholas Arnold, a SP-MAGTF Crisis Response MV-22 Osprey pilot and weapons and tactics instructor. “The leadership here seemed genuinely interested in the aircraft and impressed with its capabilities.”

The Marine Corps and Italian aviators share a bond in that both services attend the U.S. Naval flight schools in Pensacola, Fla., and Corpus Christi, Texas. They recognized this bond during the visit, which corresponded with the 100th anniversary of Italian Naval Aviation.

“The Corps and Italian Navy have a common bond that we were able to build upon here,” Arnold, a Buffalo, N.Y. native, added. “I think that bond is important and only improves our relationship here in Italy.”

Related Topic Tags

Related Defense, Military & Aerospace Forum Discussions

View the Original article

Comments Off on Crisis Response Marines Familiarize Italian Naval Aviation with Osprey

Filed under Defence Talk

RAF Becomes NATO Response Force Lead

By on Friday, February 1st, 2013

The Royal Air Force’s Joint Force Air Component Commander (JFACC) today assumed lead responsibility for the NATO Response Force (NRF).

The current incumbents, the German Air Force, were represented by Brigadier General Nolte at a handover of the NRF lead duty to the RAF’s JFACC Air Commodore Martin Sampson at an official ceremony at HQ Air Command.

Leading the NRF is based on a rotational system, and is led by the UK once every 4 years. It is made up of air, land, maritime and special force components that maintain high readiness to deploy around the world, providing immediate military response to emerging crises.

If a crisis occurs requiring NRF response in 2013, the RAF JFAC and his Headquarters will command and control joint air operations. The JFACC will integrate military air assets from NATO and tailor the capability to the specific planned mission.

Air Commodore Sampson said:

This is a really important time for the UK JFAC and the RAF. Operations over Libya emphasised how important our role within NATO is as well as underlying the need to maintain a robust air command and control capability.”

This year holds many uncertainties, the unfolding events in Africa is but one example; however, the UK JFAC is well prepared and confident in its ability to face up to the challenge of leading NATO air power.”

I would like to thank the whole German JFAC organisation for sharing its experiences of NRF leadership over the past 12 months and to General Nolte for taking the time to hand over formally today.”

As strong NATO partners, I look forward to our continued dialogue and interaction as we continue to discharge the most vital task of air command and control.”

The RAF JFAC is staffed by professional and operationally experienced airmen and women from across the Service; expert at delivering the operational capability of the RAF.

Flight Lieutenant Mark Buckley has worked in electronic earfare plans at the JFAC HQ for the past 2 years and has been involved in exercises that have prepared the RAF’s JFACC to take on the NRF role. He said:

The JFAC brings together every branch and trade of the RAF and shows what air power can do; whether it’s intelligence-gathering, shows of force, delivering relief supplies or security operations.”

Participating in exercises allows experience, corporate knowledge and working practices to be shared and provides an insight into how different HQs operate.”

Air Command and Control is at the heart of how the Royal Air Force goes about its business and the JFACC is charged with generating, enabling and commanding air power.

Related Topic Tags

Related Defense, Military & Aerospace Forum Discussions

View the Original article

Leave a comment

Filed under Defence Talk

Japan’s Defence White Paper 2012 and China’s Critical Response

On July 31, the Japanese government released the 2012 edition of the Defence White Paper titled ‘The Defense of Japan 2012’. While submitting the report for Cabinet approval, Defence Minister Satoshi Morimoto delivered a speech throwing some light on the document. Pointing out the rapidly changing security environment in East Asia, Morimoto particularly talked about the significant developments in China and North Korea in the last one decade. China’s military build-up and its constant military flexing in the Asia-Pacific region were the major highlights of Morimoto’s comments as well as in the Defence White Paper. Just like the previous edition of the Defence White Paper in 2011, this year too, the report warns that China’s military movements are “a matter of concern” for the Asian region and the international community, and “should require prudent analysis.”

Key Points on China
While underscoring China’s rapid military build-up, the White Paper states that China’s defence spending has grown more than double the level it was five years ago. Chinese military spending has also reportedly expanded around 30-times over the last 24 years. China’s Defence Budget this year, for the first time, topped the $100 billion mark, which is now more than 1.6 times that of Japan. Although the White Paper acknowledges that the defence figures provided by China might not disclose the entirety of its military spending, it argues that the gap between Japan and China on defence spending will almost certainly continue to widen further in the future. The Paper further argues that the growing defence spending of China has raised concerns in the international community due to which, of late, many countries and the US in particular has been shifting its defence strategy to focus more on Asia. Here, while emphasizing upon the Japan-US military alliance, the Paper also advocates the effective construction of Japan’s defence.

While highlighting China’s naval exercises, the White Paper states that China “plans to expand the sphere of its maritime activities” and carry out its operations “as an ordinary routine practice” in waters surrounding Japan, including the East China Sea, the Pacific Ocean and the South China Sea”. The report also accuses Beijing of ‘intruding’ into Japan’s ‘territorial waters’ by carrying out major patrols near the Japanese territory of the Senkaku Islands (Diaoyu Islands), which has been claimed by China as its own territory. The White Paper also expressed the Japanese government’s increasing concern over China’s decision to strengthen surveillance around the Senkaku islands in the East China Sea region. Here, the Paper cites two instances (in March-April 2011 and April 2012) in which Chinese helicopters, which appeared to belong to the State Oceanic Administration (SOA) of China, flew close to Japanese destroyers engaged in vigilance monitoring around the Senkaku area. While pointing out China’s long-standing territorial claims in the resource-rich South China Sea region, the White Paper speculates upon the intentions behind Chinese activities to protect “maritime rights and interests” and “energy resources.”

More significantly, the White Paper for the first time points out a shift in China’s power structure. While noting that military-decision making is not transparent in China, the Paper argues that given the increasing number of cases in which the Chinese military has expressed its own stance on security issues, the relationship between the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) seems to have “been getting complex”. Citing the PLA’s increasing influence on political decision making, the report states that this is a “risk management issue” and caution should be taken while dealing with the powerful PLA.

On the domestic problems faced by China, the White Paper points out corruption at the levels of both the central and local communist leadership, regional disparities between urban-rural and coastal-inland regions, inflation, environmental pollution, rapid aging of population, etc. According to the Paper, all these factors could destabilize the government in China. Domestic ethnic minority issues in Tibet and Xinjiang might also complicate the situation further. The Paper also argues that although after autumn 2012 China might witness a substantial reshuffle in the CCP leadership, the next government would still have to deal with all these challenges.

China’s Response

The Chinese Foreign Ministry expressed “strong discontentment” with the White Paper’s apparent concern over China’s rapid military expansion. While offering China’s stance on the Paper, Geng Yansheng, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Defence, stated: “China strongly opposes the groundless criticisms of its national defense development and military activity, as well as irresponsible remarks regarding China’s internal affairs, made in Japan’s defense white paper.”

While reiterating China’s adherence to the road of peaceful development and maintenance of a purely defensive military policy, Geng stated that “China will continue to organize normal military exercises and training activities and resolutely safeguard its national sovereignty and marine rights.” Geng even alleged that Japan was making excuses for its continued arms expansion, reinforcement of military alliances and “distorting facts” about regional security concerns.

Chinese academics have been highly critical of Japan’s recent Defence White Paper. They mostly argue that the Paper is a clear proof of Japan using its ambition for military independence to stage a military comeback. Critics are also of the view that the latest report lacks coherence possibly because in the last one year Japan changed its defence minister four times.

Many Chinese scholars are of the view that after the 2010 National Defense Program Outline (NDPO), Japan has tried to deviate from its “Basic Defense Force” approach and is focusing more on a new security strategy based on a “multifunctional, flexible, and effective defense force” with a highly capable “dynamic deterrence” capacity. In this context, Li Wei, Director of the Institute of Japanese Studies in the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, argues that Japan on one hand appears to be following the US strategy of balancing China’s military development while on the other it aims to realize its own military independence. Such changes in Japan’s defence posture have made it possible for Tokyo to step up its efforts to intervene in the South China Sea affairs along with other regional countries including Philippines and Vietnam. While arguing that the Japan-US alliance is no longer as asymmetrical as before, Li observes that Japan has already turned it into a convenient tool to become a ‘normal country.’

According to Ye Hailin, a professor in international relations at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Japan, by pointing out China’s ordinary progress in defence enhancement as a regional security concern, has shown its “unbalanced mindset”. He argues that the passing of Chinese naval vessels near the waters of Diaoyu/Senkaku islands is completely legal and justified as they were transiting the international watercourse into the Pacific Ocean. Huo Jiangang, an expert on Japanese Studies at the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR), further argues that China has not violated the freedom of navigation in these waters as argued by the report. He alleged that Tokyo is “taking its imagination as a fact” and is misleading not only the Japanese people, but also the international community.

Many Chinese critics also argue that the Defence White Papers’ continued insistence on the ‘China threat theory’ is reflective of Japan’s Cold War mentality, right-wing thoughts and fear of China. According to them, Japan should treat China’s development as an opportunity rather than as a threat. Instead of deliberately creating international tension by making irresponsible comments and mischievous speculations about China, Tokyo should make a correct assessment of the situation and adopt the right attitude towards China’s peaceful rise.

Conclusion

So far, Tokyo has not made any official comment on China’s sharp response to the White Paper. However, many Japanese academics and policy analysts have put forward their own stance about the Paper. Most of them seem to believe that to deal with China’s rapid military modernization and its increasing activities around Japanese territorial waters, the Japanese Self-Defense Force (SDF) too should steadily strengthen their surveillance and patrol activities.

They also insist that as the lack of transparency in Chinese military capabilities and decision-making process has been an issue of concern, Tokyo should pay close attention on that issue. Japan also needs to enhance its “dynamic defense cooperation” with the United States.

Although critical of China’s military build-up, Japanese analysts however contend that there is an urgent need to step up the confidence-building measures between the two countries by reactivating bilateral defence exchanges.

Title: Defense of Japan 2012
Date: 2012-08-10
File Type: html
File Size: 12.17 kB
Hits: 31
Category: Defense Papers/Reports
Download Link: Defense of Japan 2012

Related Topic Tags

Related Defense, Military & Aerospace Forum Discussions

View the Original article

Leave a comment

Filed under Defence Talk